![]() Report on work of measurement and data analysis teams and on preparation of experiments at future neutron sources Report on increase of synergy, on the major upgrades, and on improved theoretical determination and experimental evaluation of input parameters Report on identified key reactions, on technical ideas, on the coordination, and on experimental and/or theoretical verification of the key features Identification of technologies developed at ISOL facilities applicable at future facilities Updated Physics and Instrumentation case for ISOL facilities Transfer of R&D accomplishments between ISOL facilities Report on the collaborations and synergies between facilities Report on the research activities related to SHE's Just Say No.Report on the development of high power thin-target technology , and pass the filthy disease on to their students in turn. ![]() Then they get Stockholm syndrome, become vastly proud that they know to write \ldots when they mean. PhD students are forced to learn it and spend nights crying and trying to make their tables work. I've got referee reports saying "this wasn't written in TeX" as if that were a legitimate critique. And if I have to read one more time "oh, don't use vertical lines in tables, just use \booktabs" in response to a question about HOW TO DO something. Oh, it's pronounced techhhh ? Thank you for informing me, neccccchbeard. Its culture is toxically up its own posterior. Are we going to have a keyword for each of those? No. There are 100 reasons to use, e.g., italics: emphasis, foreign language, technical terms, etc. So you write \emph to emphasize something. Its model is that the markup specifies semantics, not syntax or layout. I want to look at something nice when I write English. I don't want to write `` to open quotation marks. I don't want to see backslashes everywhere. If I want to insert a picture, I don't want to have to write a paragraph of backslashed computer blah. Not 100 lines of backslashed computer blah. If I open my article in a text editor, I want to see the title, author, abstract and first paragraph. It's a mess of multiple packages which redefine each others' macros. No, I'm not, because I desire to use a computer to automate these tasks. Literally these messages say things like "just type ? now", as if I'm doing this shit manually. Its error messages might be very useful if you were running them by hand in 1985, instead of via 5 other tools. tex, xetex, latex, xelatex, biblatex, texi2dvi, latexmk. None of which I understand or want to learn. It's a mess of multiple command line tools which run each other. So was the Commodore 64, but you wouldn't use it to write your thesis on in 2020, now, would you? The problem is that you pretty much need to know when to use LaTeX to reap the actual benefits.īottom line: it's a leftover from the 1980s. There are cases where it is tremendously useful, it may be easier than the alternatives, and the quality of the product is usually quite good. None of that is meant to discourage you from learning LaTeX. Not only is is non-trivial to do, but it is entangled in markup that is frequently difficult to read and may require a "compilation" to see the outcome. Pretty much anything you may need to do is doable, but it is non-trivial to figure out. Tables and figures may not appear where you wish them to and there are times when you may wish to do something unusual, such as placing a wide table on it's own page and rotating it 90 degrees. Once you have everything you need and know how to use it, there is the problem of creating the actual document. There is no way to get around the latter. Most people avoid the former by installing a rather massive TeX distribution that satisfies most of their needs. You'll need to figure out how to properly install those macros and you will need to figure out how to use them. In many respects, it is like working with a library with programming. If the standard macros don't do what you want of them, you either need to create your own or find some made by someone else. LaTeX is also good for certain types of technical publications, particularly those involving mathematics, since it handles the typesetting.īeyond that, LaTeX is an unwieldy mess. This is useful when preparing an articles or books for publication (when the publisher supports or accepts LaTeX). One is that it encourages the writer to focus upon the logical structure of documents, rather than the formatting. LaTeX is a collection of TeX macros that are used while preparing documents, and probably isn't worth the effort to learn unless you have a specific need for it. TeX is a typesetting system that may be interesting to learn if you're interested in that sort of thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |